BetterCommerce vs OroCommerce — Which Platform Is Right for You?
OroCommerce suits developer-led teams, but BetterCommerce offers faster, simpler B2B scalability without the overhead.
Your B2B Powerhouse
Four Reasons Why B2B Brands Choose BetterCommerce Over OroCommerce
- 01
API-First & Composable
API-first architecture enables faster integrations with minimal dev effort — unlike Oro’s monolith.
- 02
Simple Business Admin
No dev tools needed. Business users manage pricing, catalogs, and workflows easily.
- 03
Built-In Commerce Suite
Native PIM, OMS, CPQ modules reduce dependency on third-party tools and delays.
- 04
Flexible Cloud Options
Choose SaaS or private cloud. Scale freely without Oro’s hosting and upgrade stress.
Faster delivery. Smarter control.
Better Time-to-Value
- 100 Days
- Average implementation time.
- 3x
- Faster go-lives than OroCommerce’s 9–18 month rollouts
- Faster go-lives than OroCommerce’s 9–18 month rollouts
Spend Less, Deliver More
- 75%
- Lower total cost of ownership compared to OroCommerce.
- 100%
- Fully-managed SaaS or private cloud - no self-hosting required.
- Fully-managed SaaS or private cloud - no self-hosting required.
All-in-One, Not All-Put-Together
- 100%
- Native suite covering OMS, PIM, CPQ, and storefronts — all-in-one
- 0%
- Dependency on plug-ins to handle core B2B workflows
Comparison
See How BetterCommerce Outshines in Key B2B Ecommerce Features
BetterCommerce |
OroCommerce | |
|---|---|---|
| Built For | B2B-first from Day One | B2B-first, developer-centric |
| Core Architecture | Composable, API-first, PBCs | Monolithic, Symfony PHP |
| Target Audience | Manufacturers, Distributors, Wholesalers | Mid-sized to enterprise IT-heavy organizations |
| Total Cost of Ownership | Lower (No 3rd-party bloat) | 320–480% Higher (custom builds + dev ops) |
| CPQ & Quote Management | Included out-of-the-box | Requires customization or third-party |
| MOQ & Role-Based Pricing | Fully supported | Partial, needs development |
| Custom Workflows & Approvals | Flexible, extensible | Requires deep customization |
| Subscription Management | Native engine | Requires integration |
| Punchout Catalog Support | Built-in | Not supported natively |
| B2B Checkout Customization | Configurable steps | Rigid; taxes/shipping shown late |
| Buyer Roles & Permissions | Granular user roles | Limited UI; developer setup needed |
| Built-in OMS & PIM | Native modules | Must integrate separately |
| Multi-Storefront Management | Native, unified backend | Requires add-ons or dev effort |
| Private Cloud Deployment Option | Supported (SaaS or private instance) | Must self-host; no SaaS option |
| Go-Live Timeline | Avg. 90–100 days | Typically 9–18 months |
| Geolocation & Tax Automation | Dynamic pricing & tax calculation | No real-time display |
| Site Speed & Page Performance | Lightweight & optimized | Template bloat; dev optimization needed |
| SEO-Optimized Blog (on main domain) | Built-in and crawlable | Blog on subdomain (SEO penalty) |
| Customer-Specific Catalogs | Built-in | Limited, app-dependent |
| Bulk Ordering | CSV Uploads, Templates | Partial, via apps |
| B2B Payment Terms (Net 30/60, Credit) | Built-in | Not supported natively |
| ERP Integration | API-first, real-time | Middleware required |
Built for B2B Complexity. Delivered With SaaS Simplicity.
BetterCommerce delivers what OroCommerce promises—minus the developer drag and extra cost.
Why choose BetterCommerce over Oro Commerce
BetterCommerce is engineered for agility, configurability, and B2B growth — without the cost and complexity of OroCommerce’s dev-heavy model.
Composable From Day One
Unlike Oro’s Symfony-based setup, BetterCommerce offers PBCs and modular APIs out of the box.
No-Code/Low-Code Admin
Built-In OMS, PIM, CPQ
Faster Implementation
SaaS or Private Instance Flexibility
Tailored B2B Workflows
Lower Engineering Overhead
Predictable TCO
Why Businesses prefer BetterCommerce to Oro Commerce
Unlock superior performance, scalability, and customization with BetterCommerce.
- 01
Built for Business Users
BetterCommerce empowers sales and ops teams via low-code tools. OroCommerce is developer-first, requiring technical resources for even small changes.
- 02
Composable, API-First Core
BetterCommerce uses modular, API-first architecture. Oro relies on Symfony PHP, with a heavier monolithic structure and longer learning curve.
- 03
Built-In Commerce Suite
BetterCommerce includes OMS, PIM, and CPQ modules. OroCommerce requires integrations or extensions, increasing project time and cost.
- 04
SaaS or Private Cloud Ready
BetterCommerce offers hosted SaaS or private deployment. Oro must be self-hosted, demanding internal teams for patches, scaling, and uptime.
- 05
Fast Time-to-Value
BetterCommerce customers go live in 100 days. OroCommerce implementations often take 9–18 months due to dev cycles and customization.
- 06
Checkout, Catalog & Pricing
BetterCommerce offers flexible logic for B2B checkout, catalogs, and roles. Oro’s workflows often require developer configuration and QA.
- 07
Predictable TCO & Upgrades
BetterCommerce has low upgrade effort and no plugin sprawl. Oro’s update cycles are dev-intensive, with frequent QA and infrastructure delays.
- 08
Built for B2B Complexity
BetterCommerce handles approvals, MOQ, CPQ, punchout, and more natively. Oro supports them, but with a steep technical and time investment.
The BetterCommerce platform is the technology that enables our business to put the customer experience at the heart of everything we do - mobile, web and in-store.
